BoardsBridge
Ethics & Medicolegal
ethics
High-impact pattern

Patient Refuses: DNR/DNAR in the Operating Room

Autonomy persists at the OR door. Reconsider, do not abandon. Negotiate procedure-directed or goal-directed limits — never condition surgical access on rescission.

For a patient who continues a DNAR order before surgery, inform the patient or designated surrogate which procedures are essential to the anesthesia and proposed procedure and which are not essential and may be refused; do not require DNAR rescission as a condition of surgery.

If you forget

Reconsider, do not abandon — DNAR auto-suspension in the OR is wrong (ASA, ACS, AORN, TJC all agree).

Board trap
Examiner asks: 'The patient will not lift the DNAR, so we can require rescission before surgery — true or false?' FALSE. Do not require DNAR rescission as a condition of surgery; discuss which procedures are essential versus refusable and document the agreed limits.

Key numbers

  • 60% of anesthesiologists erroneously believe DNAR auto-suspends during anesthesia/surgery (Miller's Ch 7).
  • 2013 — year ASA updated its DNR-in-OR guidelines (Box 28.10, Miller's Ch 28).
  • 2006 — year orthopedic surgeons were successfully sued for requiring DNAR rescission as a condition of surgery (Miller's Ch 7).
Reviewed Oct 7, 2026 for clinical accuracy by BoardsBridge Editorial Process

Uri Rozen, MD — Licensed Physician, Israel

Source guidelines: Millers Anesthesia 10 Ch28 Preoperative Evaluation · Millers Anesthesia 10 Ch07 Ethical Aspects OF Anesthesia Care

Re-review cadence: 12 months from reviewed date.

Drill this as a SOE stem →

Related on BoardsBridge

Card ID: patient-refuses · Path: aba.ethics.dnr-in-or.patient-refuses

Educational reference only. Reviewed for clinical accuracy against current authoritative guidelines. Not a substitute for clinical judgment. See editorial process and the sitemap entry for this card.